  | 
  
      | 
  
      | 
    
       Treating Damaged Skin
  By Dr. Des 
      Fernandes
  Iontophoresis  There 
      has been a resurgence of interest in iontophoresis in the medical 
      profession. Why call it a renaissance of iontophoresis in this day and 
      age? We've known about galvanic current for about 200 hundred years and 
      iontophoresis (a word derived from Greek meaning the transport of 
      electrically charged chemicals called ions) through skin was demonstrated 
      almost 100 years ago.
  Skin care therapists have used galvanic 
      currents to treat skin for about 70 years -so what can be new? First 
      activate the skin on negative current, then massage and finally soothe the 
      skin on positive for a refreshed appearance. Right? No! Wrong! Of 
      course these ideas are wrong because they ignore the basic scientific 
      principles. First of all one has to understand that iontophoresis will 
      only occur if the targeted active chemicals have an electrical charge 
      (i.e. they are ions carrying either a positive or negative electrical 
      charge, or will ionise with electricity). When a low intensity galvanic 
      current is applied to a molecule that can dissociate into a positive ion 
      (cation) and a negative ion (anion), then it dissociates more readily in 
      the presence of water and salts. Negative ions move towards the positive 
      pole, and positive ions move towards the negative pole. As a result ions 
      can be carried to deeper layers of the skin and concentrated 
      there.
  If a positive current is applied to the skin together with 
      appropriate gels, then the positive pole will act exactly like a magnet 
      (North Pole repels North Pole and alternately South Pole and vice versa) 
      and repel cations and attract anions. Therefore, if one wants to 
      facilitate the penetration of a cation then one has to apply a positive 
      charge to the skin. However, if one wants to make an anion penetrate 
      deeper into the skin, then one has to apply a negative charge.
  To 
      understand iontophoresis better, then one must go back to the very first 
      demonstration of its power. Two rabbits were selected and one poison that 
      has a positive charge was applied to one ear and a poison with a negative 
      charge was applied to the other ear. Only one ear was treated with an 
      electrical current. When the positively ionised poison was treated with a 
      negative current, nothing happened. When positive current was used then 
      the rabbit died! So either positive current was responsible, or the 
      positive poison ions moved through the skin into the blood and killed the 
      rabbit. The second rabbit then proved that it was the ions because when a 
      positive current was used, nothing happened, whereas when a negative 
      current was used, the rabbit died! The only explanation was that the 
      positive and negative ions had been repelled by their similar charges and 
      had gone through the skin.
  This was a magnificent demonstration but 
      unfortunately not enough people paid attention to it and it was lumped 
      together with things like hypnosis and ignored by the medical profession. 
      In recent years, research workers have looked again at iontophoresis and 
      have tried to define its mysteries. As a result we've learned a great deal 
      about iontophoresis and today research workers believe that iontophoresis 
      can very often be as effective as injections into the skin or muscles. 
      Diabetics may one day wear only a simple instrument like a watch and in 
      that way dose themselves with enough insulin to keep them selves healthy. 
      Other powerful medicines can even be taken more than 2 cms. Into the body 
      by simple electrical currents. Iontophoresis promises to become a major 
      method for treating people without the use of injections and other 
      invasive techniques. The research workers have realised that we have to 
      know certain properties about ions, not merely that they can ionise. When 
      a molecule that can be ionised at an appropriate pH is subjected to a 
      galvanic current, the molecule ionises into its anion and cation. We have 
      learned that the concentration of the ions is important. The strongest 
      solution is not always the best. We also know now that the properties of 
      the current are important. Certain wave shapes and intermittent 
      application of the current are better than continuous galvanic current. 
      
   | 
      | 
  
    | 
       There are some very important rules that have to be followed when doing 
      iontophoresis. 
      
        - The selected molecule must be ionised into positive and 
        negative components and be maintained as ions during the treatment. You 
        cannot iontophorese chemicals that are not ionised.
  
         - The size of the ion is important. For example even though a complex 
        protein like collagen may be possible to ionise, the size of the 
        important ion of collagen is so large that it cannot be transported 
        through skin.
  
         - There is a limit to the number of polar substances that can be used 
        simultaneously. We believe that during iontophoresis "pores" open up 
        through membranes and the charged particles can move through them. If 
        there are too many charged particles then the "pores" may be "blocked" 
        by the crowd of ions converging all at once.
  
         - The ion must be water-soluble because electricity is only conducted 
        through water and not lipids.
  
         - The pH of the active gel is of fundamental importance. The right 
        ingredient at the right concentration won't work properly if the pH is 
        wrong. Each ion has it's own ideal pH at which it will be ionised 
        best.
  
         - The current used must be appropriate. You cannot use 
        any current you like.
  
         - The current used should be high enough to be effective 
        and still safe. The higher the current, the faster the ions will 
        move.
  
         - Intermittent current works better than continuous 
        current because as the ion moves into the skin it will react with other 
        chemicals and needs to be re-ionised. I have used the Environ® Ionzyme 
        DF 1998 machine for the work that I have done.
  
         - The treatment period should be at least 10 minutes and probably not 
        longer than 30 minutes. Most of the ions pass through the skin at about 
        8 to 15 minutes and then relatively little passes through after 30 
        minutes. I prefer to use a "field" of electrical charge rather than use 
        rollers which produce rather localised effects. I use a specialised 
        gauze that retains moisture (Hazegauze®) more effectively than any other 
        gauze I have used.
  
         - It is possible, maybe even highly desirable to treat 
        skin with only one polarity. It is not necessary to treat the skin with 
        the opposite current after doing the active treatment. If you do that 
        then you will reverse the beneficial effects of the active 
        treatment!
  
         - Of course, the ion will only have positive effects if 
        in fact scientific research has proved that it is effective. Ionising 
        salt water into skin cannot have the same effects as ionising a proven 
        rejuvenating vitamin ion into the skin. 
  
      We are also learning about electro-osmosis which is closely allied to 
      iontophoresis. In this case, ions move along the electrical 
      "concentration" gradient i.e. from a high current to a low current. 
      Another intriguing phenomenon is electro-poration. By this we mean the 
      "holes" created in membranes by electrical current which then allow non 
      ionised molecules to pass through the membranes.  iontophoresis when 
      correctly used is proving to a be a powerful tool. However, it does have 
      problems. First of all it can only used on molecules that can be ionised. 
      Not all molecules can be ionised at physiological levels and some cannot 
      be ionised. Secondly, if strong currents are used and the current us built 
      up too quickly when using simple galvanic current, then a burn may occur. 
      One has to remember that in fact some very complex chemical changes occur 
      at the exact site of the iontophoresis contact points. Strong alkalis may 
      be formed or strong acids may damage the skin. Modern iontophoresis has 
      been used to minimise wrinkles, to eliminate pigment blemishes, soften 
      scars and normalise skin. However, this only happens when the gels used 
      contain the right ingredients, at the right pH, with the right 
      concentration, treated with the correct current properties for the correct 
      amount of time. Change only one of these important points and the 
      treatment becomes a simple complex manipulation of skin and the clients 
      purse.
  With properly controlled iontophoresis up to 400% better 
      penetration can be achieved under ideal conditions and the improvement of 
      skin can be hastened quite dramatically.  | 
      | 
  
    | 
       | 
    Schimdt published the results of 
      iontophoresing retinoic acid or Estriol into skin scarred by acne. This 
      gave results that are comparable with dermabrasion of the skin. 
      Dermabrasion thins the skin and results in an artificial looking surface 
      whereas iontophoresis of the skin nutrients actually makes the skin 
      thicker, healthier and more beautiful. I have used both vitamin C and A to 
      achieve this result in about 30 treatments done twice a week initially and 
      then later once a week for 20 minutes on each occasion.  | 
     | 
  
    | 
       | 
    This man wanted his facial skin to 
      be the same colour as his neck skin. Unfortunately he came from West 
      Africa and we could only do 11 treatments. However, one can see that the 
      facial skin is now very similar to the neck skin. We used a gel of 
      magnesium ascorbyl phosphate and retinol.  | 
     | 
  
    Sonophoresis 
         Sonophoresis has the advantage that the compounds do 
      not have to be ionised. The best explanation for the movement through skin 
      seems to be explained as cavitation of the skin cells and membranes. This 
      process of cavitation occurs during the treatment but these cavities 
      disappear after the treatment and histological examination of the skin has 
      shown that the skin is normal after the treatment. These may in fact be 
      the same pores as are induced by iontophoresis. Mitragotri has shown that 
      contrary to expectation, cavitation of the skin occurs better the nearer 
      one is to audible sound. In fact in the range of the sounds that dolphins 
      emit their sonic messages, we get the best cavitation and penetration of 
      molecules through skin. This range is at most only 10% of the sound that 
      is used in conventional ultra-sound machines. Mitragotri has described 
      that with sonophoresis he could get about 4000% better penetration after 
      five minutes of sonophoresis at 20 KHz than with topical application.  | 
     | 
  
    | 
       | 
    I believe that the higher levels of 
      vitamin A within the cells results in higher levels of retinoic acid which 
      then stimulate mRNA responses which lead to faster growth of keratinocytes 
      and greater production of collagen. When vitamin C is included in the 
      cocktail then wrinkles can actually be safely "melted "away. | 
     | 
  
    | Please see the photo 
      gallery for results from using iontophoresis and sonophoresis using the 
      Environ® Ionzyme DF 1998 machine  | 
      | 
  
      | 
      | 
  
      | 
     | 
  
      | 
  
      | 
    
      | 
     | 
  
     | 
     | 
     | 
     | 
     | 
     |